Could Obama’s administration be attempting to shift Americans’ focus to “A RELATIVELY SAFE but PASSIONATE” issue?

President Barack Obama

By Vanderbrink Mardell 


Could Obama’s administration be attempting to shift Americans’ focus to “A RELATIVELY SAFE but PASSIONATE” issue? 
Most of us understand that a strategist is not a key player in any political party and that the stay-at-home-moms rank highest among the conservative and the independent voters. A slam against any (wealthy or not wealthy) stay-at-home mom angers these voter If I was in Obama’s camp I’d want to get the conservatives and independents off the facts of what Obama has been doing and riled up on the issue of “stay-at-home-mom” because then Obama, his wife and others could rush to disagree and there’s the attempt to win the votes that Obama needs for re-election….. has everyone missed the fact that it is indeed odd that the opinion of an unimportant strategist regarding a stay-at-home-mom is more talked about than Obama’s hot mic whisperings to the Russian President.. Consider the following and you decide if we should be talking about the ease Ann Romney had as an at-home-mom or should we be remembering, investigating and talking about……. 
In 2009 Obama scrapped the long awaited missile defense system for Poland and the Czech Republic because Russia objected. 
• In 2009 Obama scrapped NASA and all of the future technological advances sure to be developed by NASA which would keep the US on the cutting edge of defense technology. He instructed the NASA hierarchy to focus on outreach to Muslim nations. Nearly 75% of the advances which we have made in aerospace have come from the technology created by the space program; which has now been flushed down the toilet by the America-hating Obama. 
• He has refused to keep secret the technical data on the U.S Standard Missile-3, as called for in the 2012 defense authorization bill. 
• Obama will not pledge to keep American missile technology from China, North Korea and Iran, as it would “…interfere with [his] constitutional authority to conduct foreign affairs…” Really? We need to give the Communists our missile technology as a condition to talks about human rights and world peace? 

Obama with  Medvedev 

• Obama will provide Russia information on every Trident missile supplied to Great Britain as part of an arms control deal signed with Russian President Medvedev. 
• Leaked cables show that the US will now provide Russia with ALL serial numbers of Trident missiles transferred to Britain. 
• Obama proposes the United States CUT its nuclear arsenal by 80%, yet demands no reciprocity on the part of Russia or any of America’s enemies. 
• Joe Miller, 2010 US Senate candidate from Alaska, reports that, under the guise of drawing a boundary, 7 Alaska-area islands and oil rich sea beds containing perhaps billions of barrels were given to Russia in an unannounced, secret deal by Obama’s State Department. 
Under Obama’s programs, by 2016, defense will account for 20% of the national budget, yet bear over HALF of the deficit-reduction cuts.
In mid-March, Obama declared he would “…provide the Russians with detailed technical information about the anti- missile systems he plans to base in Eastern Europe…”
And Congressman Darrell Issa said that “the American people should be very afraid,” continuing with “I judge that in fact he is going to sell out our national defense after the election.” 
Who cares if Mitt Romney can afford to have his children’s stay-at-home-mom have one nanny or fourteen…that’s not going to impact our nation’s survival but what will impact our nation’s survival is that this man can use those same economic business skills and strategies to get the United States back on good economic ground. --go to www.issa.house.gov and also Google Representative  Communists . We all need to start reading, gathering facts and thinking about what it means if Obama is re-elected … Have we all lost our minds??? IF OBAMA IS RE-ELECTED, THE COST WILL BE TOO HIGH !! The cost will be our freedom, our constitution and our culture but most importantly, the costs of our behavior and mind-set will fall upon the lives of our children and grandchildren.