This is an independent page which is dedicated to see that Conservative values are respected and advanced. We will attack if attacked and fight fire with fire, this page will not allow lies and insults. So join us in this incredible quest and let's win our country back.
"CONSIDER THIS: Okay, The Absurdity Of The “Chick- Fil-A” Controversy And A Note To The Ignorant (To The Fatuous That Simply Means Those Who Choose To Ignore The Facts) Who Take The Time To Comment In Outrageous And Sometimes Even Hateful Responses Without Even Taking The Time To Read What Was Actually Said In The First Place, Do Something That Shows You Have At Least Some Sense Of Your Own And Not Follow Every Whining Hypocrite, Who Has Their Feelings Hurt And Then Just Quote What They Say Was Said, But Rather Confirm And Become Knowledgeable About The Subject Before Your Lips Dribble With Misinformation.
The Truth: The President And Chief Operating / Operations Officer (COO) Of Chick-Fil-A, Mr. Dan Cathy Originally Stated In A “Christian Based Magazine” Interview, That He Believes In The Biblical Definition Of The Family Unit (I.e. Marriage). When He Was Afterwards Asked On The “Ken Coleman Show” Over The Radio About That Comment, Mr. Cathy Then Stated The Following, “I Think We Are Inviting GOD’S Judgment On Our Nation When We Shake Out Fist At HIM And Say “We Know Better Than YOU As To What Constitutes A Marriage’ And I Pray GOD‘S Mercy On Our Generation That Has Such A Prideful, Arrogant Attitude To Think That We Have The Audacity To Define What Marriage Is About.“
Now, From This Man’s Statement Which Is In Alignment With The Holy Scripture, Which Is Considered By Billions To Be The WORD OF GOD, He Has Since, In Ignorance And Stupidity, Been Labeled, Hateful, A Bigot, Anti-Gay And Even A Racists…
Mr. Cathy Is Being Persecuted For Doing What Millions Of Others Do, But Usually From Their Hidden Closets Deep Within Their Illusion Of Security, In Their Own Homes.
Many People Jump On The Fight The “Anti-Gay” Bandwagon Because It Is The Politically Correct Thing To Do And They Have Been Deceived Into Believing That All Of Their Favorite Actors, Musicians And Elected Politicians Believe And Feel That Same Way And That Somehow Their New Wealth Or Position Has Made Them More Intelligent Or “Evolved” Than Everyone Else.
Why Do You Not Understand That The Morals Of Public Personalities Are Not Always Those Formed From Their Hearts? Most Of Them Had Different Morals Prior To Becoming Public Personalities And Then Their Newly Perceived Morals Are Dictated By Money And Their Fans And Their Voters.
Now, This Idea That Someone Disagrees With You, Somehow Makes That Person A Hater Of You Or Anti You, Is Simply Not Realistic And People Throw Around Labels So Much That They Are Used As A Weapon Anymore, Where Once Upon A Time They Were Realistic Identifiers.
So To All Who Read This Whom Proclaim They Are Followers Of Judaism Or Christianity Who Have Jumped On The Persecute Chick Fil-A Bandwagon, Remember This Man Made No Proclamation That GOD Hasn’t Already Said And/Or Done, In Reference To This Same Issue, So If You Have Issue With Mr. Cathy, Perhaps You Have Issue With GOD As Well…
Furthermore, To All Who Read This Whom Do Not Proclaim They Are A Follower Of Or Believer In GOD Or The Bible, What Do You Care Anyway If Mr. Cathy Said This? By Your Own Admission There Is No Biblical Definition Of Marriage And His Prayer And GOD’S Retribution Is Not Real To You Anyway…
Finally, To All Who Still Jump On The Persecute Chick Fil-A Bandwagon, Perhaps You Should Start By Boycotting Those States That Still Believe In The Biblical Definition Of The Family Unit And All Of The Churches As Well, But Most Of All… Please Start With The Muslim Mosques And Those Muslim Countries Who Are The Real Outspoken Anti-Gay Marriage Believers…
I’m Sorry, Who Was The Hypocrite Again ???
QUOTE: “Being Forced To Tolerate Something Contrary To Your Religious Beliefs Under The Guise Of Political Correctness Is Already Abhorrent, But For One To Be Forced To Forsake Their GODLY Values To Accept And Agree With Man’s Values, Simply Is NOT Tolerable“ -- K.E.Youngblood… " on Liberals are Hypocrites's timeline.
Beth Meyers, who is the woman assisting Mitt Romney find his Vice President and running mate, has announced the release of free app on your iPhone or Android device which will alert you to who Mitt Romney's VP is before anyone else.
Of course, members of the media will also download the app so that they can announce Mitt's pick as quickly as possible. However, its an innovative idea to garner more interest and excitement in Mitt Romney and his VP pick. It also helps add to the suspense of finding out who Mitt's VP is. Also, I think the Romney team wanted to find a way for people to feel personally involved with the Romney team by giving them an opportunity to be personally notified rather than find out who he picked from the news.
See more of Jared Allebest / Conservative Samizdat here....................................................................... http://conservativesamizdat.blogspot.com/
This upcoming election seems to be the most important in my lifetime. I believe Independents will be a big part in deciding who the next President of the United States will be. Id like to show those who are in support of Romney for president and how Independents are more likely to vote for Romney over another Republican candidate against Obama. If this is realized, I think Romney would get even more support because we need change in the White House to get back the Country we all love....... April Busch
Once again, there is new speculation that Obama's surrogates plan to go after Mitt Romney's faith since none of Obama's attacks on Mitt are working:
Anyway, attacking Romney on Bain hasn't proved to be effective in any polls, but there is no reason for Obama to stop. Again, what else does he have? Newsweek is doing its part this week by calling Romney a wimp, a la 1987. That petty insult didn't work against George H.W. Bush, but again, it shows the left is mentally exhausted. It reveals how trapped and empty it has become.
Obama will figure out a few more promises he can make to lure voters to the dole, but that has become old hat. I really believe there are meetings at the Obama campaign and at the White House (what's the difference?) where the question on the table is, "What can we give away to whom that will get us votes?" As the Obama campaign exhausts itself, having misspent money and failed with its messages too early in the election cycle, it is near the bottom of the barrel. The final 100 days are here and all Obama can do is attack — but he needs some new material.
I look for the "September surprise" to be Mormonism on trial. At first the attacks will come from marginal surrogates, then the reliable half-cocked usual suspects among Democrats in Congress. (Somebody cue Debbie Wasserman Schultz.) Next, a member of the left's apologencia from the MSM will write a cerebral, somber piece saying the tenets of Mormonism are fair game, and then we will be off to Slimytown. Romney will be confronted with this or that Mormon practice or theological position, the late-night comics will weigh in and Obama will have a distraction that could linger while he hopes for a break or something external to change the trajectory of the race.
A new Pew survey released Thursday found that eight in 10 voters either are either completely “comfortable” with Romney being a Mormon or simply don’t care. White evangelicals are slightly more skeptical, but the poll found that it made no difference in how ardently they support Romney.
Further evidence indicates that attacking Mitt's faith would be a losing strategy for Obama:
Not only do voters have huge information gaps when it comes to candidates’ religions, but they are not interested in learning more. Another Pew survey released July 24 found that only 16 percent of voters want to know more about Romney’s faith. There are a couple of explanations for that fact; voters may think they already know what candidates believe, or they might not find it particularly relevant to who they plan on voting for.
The latter is certainly the case for a large number of religious voters. Most voters surveyed say the economy is their primary issue, and other evidence suggests that Christians, Jews, and Mormons alike are more likely to vote for a candidate’s policies instead of basing their decision on his or her religion. (The same is true for other groups: immigrants, for example, consistently rate the economy as more important than immigration.) Sectarian political identification may have been alive and well in the JFK era, but it seems to have evaporated since then.
Regardless if the speculation that Obama or his surrogates will go after Mitt is true or not, its not winning strategy for Obama. Obama has unleashed all of his arsenal on Mitt and none of it has stuck. Obama might be desperate enough to try this attack on Mitt's religion just to win another term but the American people will see right through it.
See more of Jared Allebest here...................
CONSIDER THIS LOGIC: As We All Have Heard, Unless You Live Under A Rock Or Only Ever Watch The Main Steam News Channels, That The Country Of Canada Has A Huge Reserve Of Oil That It Generates From Literally Squeezing The Oil Out, Which Is Trapped In Oil / Tar Sands.
While Working With Oil Production Companies, They Have Been Able To Develop This Extraction Process To Be As Efficient And Environmentally Considerate As Possible, To Even Meet The Guidelines And Environmental Criteria Set Forth By America’s Environmental Protection Agency (E.P.A.) And Have Worked Hand In Hand With American Agencies To Plan The Most Efficient And Considerate Route To Transfer This Newly Produced Oil To The United States Refineries To Sell Their Product Solely To Their Nearest Neighbor And Ally In An Mutually Beneficial Agreement.
The Only Hold-Up To The Signing Of The Final Agreements And To Commence The Operation Of The Construction Of The Transfer Pipeline (Keystone XL Pipeline) To Begin Flowing The Black Blood Of Our Economy South Across The Canada / United States Border Down To The State Of Texas, Which No Doubt, Could And Would Have Certainly Reduced Our Nation’s Dependency On Middle East Oil And Allowed Some Negotiating Room In Bargaining With Those Controlling Oil-Lords, Was The Continuous Objections Being Put Forth By The Left Leaning Liberal Groups, Whose Proclaimed Main Concerns Were, “To Protect The Environment”.
Even After A Multi-Year Study And Approval Of A Plan For The Construction Of A Safe Pipeline And Route, Before The Contracts Could Be Signed, Again The Left Leaning Liberal, So Called “Green Groups” Filed More Objections And Even Purchased More Influential Mouthpieces In Our Own Government To Stand In Opposition To This Same Project, Again On Their Professed Concerns For “The Protection Of The Environment”.
Since Their Money And Influence Reached Even The Highest Political Office Among Many Others, Again The Project Was Put On Hold, At Least Until After Another Study, That Would Coincidentally Take Until After The Upcoming Presidential Election.
So With The Infinite Wisdom Of A Select Few, With Their Proclaimed Sole Concern For “The Protection Of The Environment“, The Rest Of This Whole Country, Stands To Miss Out On The Creation Of Badly Needed Jobs, But We Also Lose Out On Purchasing A Less Expensive Product To Boost Our Fuel Supply, From Our Own Neighbors, Which Would Therefore, Reduced The Risk Of Our Gas Prices Drastically Increasing On Every Single Threat Of Turmoil In The Middle East.
So Do You Think That These Same Infinitely Wise, Left Leaning Liberal, So Called Green Groups, Whose Proclaimed Main Concern Was “To Protect The Environment“, Believed That By Stopping The Progress And Benefits To America, They Would Also Stop The Canadian Production Of Those Resources Or The Construction Of A Pipeline To Sale Those Same?
I Hope They Did Not, Because In Fact, They Failed Miserably If That Was Their True Goal. They Only Made Things Much Worse For America And Ironically For Their Same Proclaimed Environmentalist‘s Cause.
The Canadians Will Now Simply Change The Direction Of Their Pipeline And Then Flow Those Precious And Valuable Resources Out To Their Coast Line To Be Placed On Shipping Vessels And Then Shipped Half Way Around The World To The Country Of China.
So To Those Green Group Protesters, Do You Mean That One Part Of The Environment Is Worth “Protecting” More Than Another ? Do You Feel More Comfortable Now That The Overseers Of That Same Environmental Protection, Are Those Not Answerable To America’s Environmental Protection Agency, Which Has Some Of The World’s Most Stringent Environmental Policies And Spectacular Oversight Of Those Same ?
Do You Feel That All Of That Oil Was A Greater Risk To The Environment Transferring Over A Couple Of Thousand Of Miles Of An American Standards And Quality Constructed And Maintained Pipeline, Than It Will Be Now, As It Travels Over A NON-American Standards And Quality Constructed And Maintained Pipeline And Worse Yet, Then Shipped Over Thousands Of Miles Of Some Of The Roughest And Most Dangerous Ocean Routes In The World ?
To All Of The Purchased More Influential Mouthpieces In Our Own Government Who Joined These Same In Opposition Of This Project, Did You Consider That You Are Allowing China To Have Better Bargaining Power With The Middle East Oil Companies, While American Will Remain At The Mercy Of Those Same Controllers Of The World’s Largest Oil Cartel ?
Now Consider Closely… With Our Massive Debt To China And Our Continuous Ignorance In Borrowing Money From One Hand Of China, In Some Cases Just To Foolishly Give Some To Their Other Hand, Has Anyone Considered That, Not Only Is America Not Getting That Less Expensive Neighborhood Oil, But We Are Also Undoubtedly Paying For China To Buy Their Exact Same Life Blood From Half Way Around The World From Them, While We Incomprehensibly Continue To Purchase Ours From Half Way Around The World From America.
I Wonder How Much Greater Is The Environmental Impact Of Those Trans World Shipping Methods, How Much More Pollution Is Produce And How Much More The Risk, Than Oil Flowing Along An American Quality Pipeline, Oh, But What Do I Know, They Are The More Intelligent Evolved Ones Who Are Proclaiming To “Protect The Environment“…...
In these Politically Correct (PC) minds any sexual activity is protected under civil rights legislation (Morals? don't you dare say that word in my presence again you hater! Yeah, those kind of civil rights).
It's incredible to me that they would bring up Judas as the image of the traitor that violates their cause which stands for no morals. When it was Judas who betrayed Jesus who was the very embodiment of morality, his entire mission in life was to teach the moral way of living. Not only to care for and love your fellow man, regardless of his state of sin, but he set a moral standard of sexual behavior as well (As did his Apostles after Him).
Remember the woman that was brought to him, being caught in the very act of adultery, and the crowd wanted to stone her. He forgave her of her sins, but then told her to go her way and to "SIN NO MORE." He did not condone the sexual immorality, He considered it a sin, but forgave her on the condition she would commit it no more. He still loved her in her sinful state enough to save her life and forgive her, and to teach her the truth.
But the PC thought police get this so confused. They think that if you believe in the standard of behavior Jesus set, it follows that you must hate the person who violates that standard, they believe you couldn't possibly love them. Thus, those that support traditional marriage (who teach the Lords standard) are continually labeled haters, because to the PC thought police the idea that these two thoughts, of setting a standard and loving all people, cannot exist in the same mind simultaneously.
This is so untrue, and so contrary to the teachings of Christ. Christians believe everyone of us have violated the standards (commandments) the Lord has set in our lives often, and we depend on Our Lords love and our fellow Christian's consistent love to see us through these troubled periods while we get back on the road. We want to extend the same love to all people, but they reject it, believing we can only hate them. No matter what we do or say to convince them otherwise. And, if they choose to continue to live contrary Jesus standard of behavior is no reason to stop loving them. In fact the second greatest commandment is to "Love thy neighbor as thy self." Jesus left no escape hatches on that love, he didn't say "Unless they are gay," "unless they are a democrat or republican" "unless thy are Muslim" etc. The commandment is clear, everyone, for everyone is our neighbor.
These foolish "Christian" "Pastors" that preach on TV about building barbed wired stockaids in the desert to heard gays into them so that they can starve to death sounds more like the teachings of Satan than Jesus. It sure doesn't sound like the way Jesus talked to the woman taken in adultery, or the way someone would talk who was keeping the second commandment. But the PC police, take that fools TV sermon, watch it and claim that is how all Christians are. What a disservice someone like that has done when he claims a false mantel of authority and gets a TV camera to talk into. The damage is incalculable for those of us who are trying to build bridges. So let us watch our words, be an example of the Savior's love, accepting of all men and women, but still teaching the standards the Lord has set. It is never a mistake to show kindness and love.
Any sitting president running for reelection undoubtedly has enjoyed somewhat of a championship advantage. It’s difficult to unseat a sitting president, no matter who is running or what state the economy is in. Five sitting presidents have been defeated during their reelection bid in the past 100 years. Two of the most common reasons that presidents have typically been denied a second term are high unemployment, and an approval rating below 48%.
No doubt this has sent red flags up all across the Obama campaign. However, it may not be the only bad news. One more statistic that probably has the president and his top campaign officials worried is that no president has ever won re-election while at the same time loosing a popular support during their first term.
Pres. Barack Obama
24 presidents in U.S. history have sought reelection. Of the 15 that succeeded in earning successive victories, each of them enjoyed more popular support the second time around than they did the first. George W. Bush, despite how heated things became towards the end of his first term, enjoyed 11.6 million more votes in 2004 than he did in 2000.
No president has ever lost support and still retained the office. President Obama has good reason to be concerned, because of the fact that he has been slowly but steadily bleeding support.
Jewish support has dropped for the president by 10 points according to Gallup. It is the first significant drop in Jewish support for a Democratic presidential candidate in over two decades. (Michael Dukakis also saw a significant drop in support among this group before losing to George H.W. Bush in 1988) Mitt Romney could make further inroads with Jewish voters once his support for Israel and personal friendship with Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu becomes better known.
Young people and union households also support President Obama overall, however his support has fallen with both of these groups since assuming office. Non-union workers have tilted over to Romney.
The percentage of small business owners that support Obama has dropped to 35%, dropping sharply from 41% during the first quarter of this year.
Several prominent individuals like Earl Ray Tomlin, Colon Powell, and Senator Joe Manchin (D-WV), who supported Obama in 2008 have refused to commit this time. Congressman Artur Davis, used to support the president but now is supported Romney. He has also switched his party from Democrat to Republican.
The president still enjoys high support among African Americans and Hispanics, however whether or not they will show up in the same massive numbers that they did in 2008 remains in doubt. Democratic enthusiasm has sputtered. Republicans now are leading Democrats in voter enthusiasm, 51% to 39%.
President Obama beat Senator John McCain (R-AZ) in 2008 with 52.9% of the vote, which is by no means a comfortable enough margin to be able to lose support from and still guarantee a victory. On top of that, the president is not up against the same half-hearted campaign that he was up against then. Romney’s campaign is proving to be quite formidable, both at raising money and responding to attacks. Rather than put out a simple statement rebuking Obama and the media’s claims about Romney being an outsourcer, they released a massive, scathing document disproving every claim made by the Obama campaign.
Not only is the Obama campaign up against a strong, highly organized campaign that is raising more money than they are, but they are also against a base that is energized. In 2008, Republicans were a demoralized party. This time around, Republican enthusiasm has surged, while Democratic enthusiasm has slumped.
Romney now leads Obama in the latest Rasmussen and CBS/NYT polls, while Gallup has them tied, according to Real Clear Politics. The only poll that has Obama ahead outside of the margin of error is an NBC/WSJ poll with a sample so skewed that the people who put it together should be embarrassed.
While President Obama may be able to squeak out a victory on November 6th, the odds are not in his favor as much as some pundits might have you believe. He’s going to have to fight harder than he ever has just to stop bleeding votes. Then he’ll have to fight again to win them back. Meanwhile Governor Romney is hot on his heels, gaining more every week.
While Obama does enjoy high personal approval ratings, new polls have come out showing that people trust Mitt Romney much more when it comes to fixing the economy. All things being considered, the president could very easily lose on November 6th.
Mitt Romney displayed his quick wit and humor in an interview with Brian Williams. Watch the entire interview below. The best part comes around the 9 minute mark of the interview:
When Brian Williams asked Romney if he's looking for an“incredibly boring white guy” as his Vice President, I love Mitt's response: “You told me you were not available.”
Brian Williams could only politely laugh at that smackdown.
Overall, Mitt Romney did a great job with an incredibly boring
white liberal interviewer. Way to go, Mitt!!
See more of Jared Allebest / Conservative Samizdat here..............
Please SHARE our "Special Edition" cartoon! You can also license this image for T-shirts, posters, etc. Send me (Sal Velluto) a private message on FB, for more info. All proceeds to go directly to the Romney Campaign. * Exclusive license: $99.95 donation. * Non exclusive license: $49.95 donation. * Original (B&W) cartoon $49.95 donation. (+ $6.20 S&H) * Autographed color print $3.00 donation. (+ $6.20 S&H)
See more of Sal Velluto here..................................
Small businesses are the lifeblood of our economy. But President Obama's comments last week show that he just doesn't understand who the real job creators are. How can he help small businesses when he doesn't even recognize their value?
When your "friends" cannot explain why they voted for Democrats, give them this list. They can then pick their reasons from this "TOP 12"
1. I voted Democrat because I believe oil companies' profits of 4% on a gallon of gas are obscene, but the government taxing the same gallon of gas at 15% isn't.
2. I voted Democrat because I believe the government will do a better job of spending the money I earn than I would.
3. I voted Democrat because Freedom of Speech is fine as long as nobody is offended by it.
4. I voted Democrat because I'm way too irresponsible to own a gun, and I know that my local police are all I need to protect me from murderers and thieves.
5. I voted Democrat because I believe that people who can't tell us if it will rain on Friday can tell us that the polar ice caps will melt away in ten years if I don't start driving a Prius.
6. I voted Democrat because I'm not concerned about millions of babies being aborted so long as we keep all death row inmates alive.
7. I voted Democrat because I think illegal aliens have a right to free health care, education, and Social Security benefits.
8. I voted Democrat because I believe that business should not be allowed to make profits for themselves. They need to break even and give the rest away to the government for redistribution as the Democrats see fit.
9. I voted Democrat because I believe liberal judges need to rewrite the Constitution every few days to suit some fringe kooks who would never get their agendas past the voters.
10. I voted Democrat because I think that it's better to pay billions to people who hate us for their oil, but not drill our own because it might upset some endangered beetle or gopher.
11. I voted Democrat because while we live in the greatest, most wonderful country in the world, I was promised "HOPE AND CHANGE".
12. I voted Democrat because my head is so firmly planted up my butt, it's unlikely that I'll ever have another point of view.
There is never enough room or time for pundits in an election year and the rumors and hypothetical scenarios are at their best. The latest one may not be too much of a stretch and that is that New Jersey Governor Chris Christie will be the keynote speaker for the Republican Convention in August.
First, let’ forget the notion that Christie is being considered as presumptive GOP Presidential Candidate Governor Mitt Romney’s running mate. That’s just not going to happen. No facts, no confirmations, just me being one of those pundits. Christie is a rising star in the GOP, but he brings little to the ticket in terms of ethnic or geographical stature.Christie is the front man for a band not a backup singer. Jersey’s lead singer would over shadow Romney and end up becoming more popular then the presumptive GOP nominee. Some would argue he already is.
As the GOP keynote speaker though, Christie would be an excellent and smart choice. Christie has that reputation of “talking Jersey”, the “you tube moments”, which lately are starting to hurt him more than help him. However, on a world stage Christie knows how to act and stay on message. I have been in some of the town hall meetings he has done; I sat in the front row and watched him captivate an audience. He knows how to work the crowd, how to personalize and mix humor and sincerity.
Rest assured that if chosen Christie will be handled. His remarks will be vetted and he will stay on script. I have always sensed that in Jersey, you either love or hate the man. The unions and teachers blast him at every opportunity and they are vocal. Yet, there is that silent group that does not oppose those cuts to the unions and teachers but because they are friends with a union worker or a teacher they keep their opinions to themselves and what happens in the ballot box stays in the ballot box.
Christie would give the Democrats and President Obama a verbal beating and do it in a way that it will energize the republican base, and give the independents’ something to think about. If the GOP needs any one magical ingredient right now, its brimstone and fire Christie style.
National polls will continue to show a close Presidential race and many in the media will linger along allowing Barack Obama a free pass on his unreliable leadership. Despite this, Americans will elect Mitt Romney in November.
How can one be so bold to make this prediction with such certainty?
It’s not that difficult. The only significant group that still supports Obama during his presidency are partisan loyalists who are not about to change their minds.
Uncommitted Voters
The first big hint was in May. Not many reported this, but during the recent Democratic presidential primary elections, the “Uncommitted” votes were extremely high. For instance, in Kentucky Obama received 57.9 percent of the Democratic vote, while “Uncommitted” delivered a whopping 42.1 percent.
Romney, who at the time had Ron Paul, Rick Santorum, and Newt Gingrich to deal with, brought in 66.85 percent of his party’s vote. Only 5.87 percent were “Uncommitted.”The story is the same in other state elections as well.So, what other major groups has Obama expanded? "Don't count on all gays voting for him..."
One of my best friends, openly gay, says "Don't count on all gays voting for him just because he is pandering to us. Being gay is not the only thing that matters to us. I will vote for anyone other than Obama."
"Who can truly say Obama has done such an outstanding job and that they feel better about their job, the economy and integrity in politics?" he added. "Not me."
Although most Unions will continue to support him, Obama’s record of giving millions of dollars’ worth of jobs to the Chinese to rebuild bridges and infrastructure (remember “shovel ready jobs for Americans?” has ticked off many individual voters.
At this point in time during the Jimmy Carter and Ronald Reagan election era, Reagan was 9 points behind Carter. Most polls show Romney currently running very close, if not even with Obama. Remember what the newspapers and polls were predicting? Reagan proved them wrong and won by a large margin.
McCain voters moving over to Obama's corner?
How many people who voted for McCain in 2008 have moved over to Obama’s corner? We can count on Romney retaining at least all of those voters.
How many people who voted for an unfamiliar Obama back then are now angry or not buying into to a second round of his lackluster hope hype? It could be in the millions.
We don’t even know who Romney’s Vice President pick is yet, but what we do know is Obama received 96% of the Black vote in 2008. How can he get more than 96% after so many of these voters have expressed their anger at so many of his failed policies and Solyndra type tactics? He has nowhere to go but down in this voting category.
Hispanic vote and Florida opportunity
The United States is seeing more rallies, the type usually associated with less conservative types, popping up against Eric Holder’s Fast and Furious debacle, Obamacare, Constitutional rights, Solyndra styled payoffs, and lack of jobs. The moderate and right minded are beginning to speak up more.
It will be interesting to see what happens with the Hispanic votes if Romney selects Marco Rubio as his running-mate. Some predict up to 15% of this group would vote against Obama. It would be nice for Romney to solidify Florida’s votes as well.
Although Obama won most of the Catholic vote back then, being sued by the Church because of his confrontation with their religious beliefs and contraception is not earning him more of these voters. It’s unlikely he can get over half of them to vote his way this time.
Military veterans votes swinging back to Romney
Romney is winning the military veteran votes by almost 25 percentage points. Compared to John McCain’s win by just 10 points last time around, it a sure thing that Romney is gaining ground here.
Obama has been pathetic on his support of Israel. Many of the 78% of Jewish voters who voted for his last time around may change their minds on Election Day.
With 17 percent of the youngest working age Americans unemployed, even college campuses have seen an upsurge in those disillusioned with Obama. It’s not likely he will garner the type of support he had 4 years ago.
How many small business owners are moving over to the Obama side of politics? Obama’s war on capitalism, attacks on business, and extreme favoritism to unions is not good news for the President in that arena.
John Cornyn on Obama: "Heading in the wrong direction."
Texas Senator John Cornyn said it best about Obama’s tax plan. It’s “heading in the wrong direction,” and added we “ought to be looking for ways to lighten that load.”
To think American business brands like Woolworth's, Chess King, Diners Club Card, Amiga are fading fast means something.
Whatever happened to TWA, Braniff and Pan Am? Even McCall’s magazine, after changing its name to Rosie because Rosie O’Donnell came aboard, is gone.
Moms are paying attention
Many mothers gave Obama a chance last time around. During his term, Obama has spent 41% more in his outlays than George W. Bush did. If he gets a second term it will average 51%.
Moms are paying more attention to this because they have to feed our children. More government spending isn’t helping their cause.
Their perception of blatant vices within Obama’s special interests circles is not good. When moms were hit with the uncertainty of Obamacare, unemployment, rising costs and worsening education trends, then all bets are off that he is gaining in this group.
By ticking off America’s mothers, even Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid need to start worrying.
Unless You Have Been Under A Rock, You Have Heard The “New” Position That Mr. Obama Has Introduced In His Campaign, Of Course Many Of Us Already Knew How He Really Felt About Capitalism In America, But For Some, This Latest Comes As A Complete And Utter Surprise Unto Them, But Only Validates What We Have Been Trying To Warn Them About All Along…
Without Repeating His Words Verbatim, The Essence Of His Message, Was That No One, Ever In America’s History Or Even Now, Has Created A Business And Became Successful On Their Own, (i.e. Without Government Help Or Services Or Infrastructure).
He Uses This Belief To Justify His Idea, That When One Has Created A Business And Becomes Successful, They Should Be Obligated To Pay More In Taxes To The Government, Somewhat Like A Gratuity, Because They Are So Thankful For The Government’s Assistance Along The Way…
I Implore You To Seriously Consider His Logic Of, If It Was Not For The Government’s Assistance, No Business Would Be Possible And No Person Could Ever Be Successful, Therefore, The Government Gets Credit For All Business And Success In America And Should Be Remunerated Accordingly.
Now Consider, By Using This Same Harvard Genius Logic, Wouldn’t The Government Then Also Be Responsible For Every Single Business That Was Attempted And Subsequently Failed, As Well As, Responsible For Every Unsuccessful Person Who Used Or Is Still Using Any Government Assistance?
Is It Then Logical, That If One Must Pay More To The Government For Having More Success, Then The Government Should Pay More To Those People Who Tried And Failed To Be Successful?
Is It Then Logical, That If The Government Is Directly Or Indirectly Responsible For All Good And Prosperity, Then They Must Also Be Responsible For All Of The Bad And Poverty?
A professional graphic artist who examined the 1973 photo believes the image of Obama’s mother, Ann Dunham, was airbrushed into the scene to cover up an African-American man who was standing next to Obama at the Honolulu airport.
Filmmaker Joel Gilbert, who commissioned the analysis, told WND there’s substantial evidence that the man in the original photograph was Frank Marshall Davis, the Communist Party member, pro-Soviet propagandist and pornographer who played a fatherly role in Obama’s teen years.
In his full-length documentary “Dreams from My Real Father,” Gilbert presents a compelling case that Davis was Obama’s biological father as well as his ideological mentor. He believes the Dunham family recruited the Kenyan student Barack Hussein Obama to act as the father, to cover up an illicit affair with a subversive political activist.
Gilbert says the black male hand under Obama’s armpit is strikingly similar to the right hand of Davis.
“We know from Obama’s own writing and interviews with Davis’ neighbors, that Obama was a regular visitor to Davis’ house from age 10,” Gilbert told WND. “This doctored photo on Obama’s own Facebook page seems to be part of a pattern of document forgery by President Obama to hide his biological and ideological relationship to communist Frank Marshall Davis.”
Obama would have been about 12 years old at the time the photo was taken. The image also shows Obama’s half-sister, Maya, and his grandfather, Stanley Dunham.
After Gilbert saw the photo on Obama’s Facebook page, he found a clearer version on the Web that he used in his video. The image used in his video has not been enhanced.
Gilbert commissioned Robert Nikolakakis, a professional graphic artist and illustrator from Montreal, Canada, to examine the photograph.
“There seem to be several suspicious anomalies in this family photo depicting President Obama as a child along with his half-sister, mother and grandfather,” Nikolakakis wrote in a report.
“All suspected alterations to the photo seem to point to the cutting, pasting and airbrushing of Barack Obama’s mother, Ann Dunham, into the photo to cover up someone of African-American origin,” he wrote.
Nikolakakis, with 21 years experience as an illustrator and graphic designer, has created websites, corporate identities, editorial illustrations, photo retouches and photo-manipulations for television shows, film studios, magazine publishers and photography studios. He as also served as a consultant for old-age special-effects makeup and has contributed to tutorials on photo manipulation.
A clearer version of the photo on Obama's Facebook page
His analysis of the Obama photo found at least half-a-dozen anomalies:
The black hand under Obama’s right armpit doesn’t match Ann Dunham’s right arm. The size and color is wrong for a white female, and the hand is positioned closer to the camera than Dunham’s arm. The hand appears to be a remnant from a black male before it was airbrushed.
The chair on the far left next to Ann Dunham is brown and smaller than the chairs on the right, which are white. The horizontal support bar for the brown chair does not align with the white chairs’ support bar.
Ann Dunham’s hair over both her right and left shoulders show signs of airbrushing.
The lighting on Ann Dunham’s face is from the far left and is not consistent with the other figures, who are lit from above. This suggests Ann Dunham’s image was placed into this scene from a different photo.
Above and below Obama’s right elbow is a ghosting effect in which a glow emanates from the arm, suggesting a different underlying image such as a light-colored shirt behind Obama. Uneven pixilation is a sign of cloning.
Ann Dunham looks to be about 25 years old, too young for this 1973 photo. Maya, who was born Aug 15, 1970, looks to be about 3 years old. Ann should look 30 years old.
“This photo forgery appears to be part of Obama’s ongoing campaign to minimize, misdirect and outright lie about damaging information about his past,” Gilbert said. “I hope the media will now demand that he come clean about his family background, his political foundations and fully reveal his agenda for transforming America.”
In his film, Gilbert shows how Davis indoctrinated Obama with a political foundation in Marxism and an anti-white worldview.
Screen grab from Joel Gilbert video shows comparison of hand in Obama family photo with photo of Davis
“This is a known phenomenon in the radical left, referred to as “red diaper babies” or “hand-me-down Marxism,” he noted.
He pointed out that much of the leadership of 1960s Marxist groups such as Students for a Democratic Society and the Weather Underground were children of Communist Party USA members, including Katherine Boudin and Jeff Jones.
President Obama’s chief campaign adviser, David Axelrod, also is a “red diaper baby,” Gilbert said.
As WND reported, Gilbert discovered racy photos published in vintage fetish and bondage magazines of Obama’s mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, that he believes were taken by Davis. The photos, he says, bolster his belief that Dunham had an intimate relationship with Davis.
Frank Marshall Davis
In his film, Gilbert documents that Ann Dunham gave her father, the “Gramps” of Obama’s autobiography, instructions to make sure her young son would be taken regularly to visit Davis while she was in Indonesia.
Obama mentions “Frank” 22 times in his autobiography, “Dreams from My Father,” without using his full name.
Gilbert believes the only scenario in which Obama’s weekly visits as a child to Davis’ home would make sense is if Davis was the biological father
Much of what Obama has told the American public of his childhood has been proven false, he said.
“We now know that the family did not stay together in Hawaii until 1962, when the Kenyan Barack Obama went to Harvard to begin his graduate studies as Obama claimed,” said Gilbert. “Ann Dunham took her infant son with her to Seattle a few weeks after his birth and began studies at the University of Washington, while the Kenyan Obama remained in Hawaii for another year before leaving for Harvard.”
The evidence, he said, “points to the conclusion that Ann Dunham’s relationship with the Kenyan Obama was a sham marriage designed to cover up an illicit affair with Frank Marshall Davis in which an infant was conceived.”
Obama’s election was not a sudden political phenomenon, Gilbert maintains.
“It was the culmination of an American socialist movement that Frank Marshall Davis nurtured in Chicago and Hawaii and has been quietly infiltrating the U.S. economy, universities and media for decades,” he said. “To understand Obama’s plans for America, look no further than communist Frank Marshall Davis.”
Jerome R. Corsi, a Harvard Ph.D., is a WND senior staff reporter. He has authored many books, including No. 1 N.Y. Times best-sellers "The Obama Nation" and "Unfit for Command." Corsi's latest book is "Where's the REAL Birth Certificate?"
.jpg)
